Current:Home > FinanceSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Quantum Capital Pro
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
Poinbank Exchange View
Date:2025-04-10 05:07:44
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (36128)
Related
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Alabama election officials make voter registration inactive for thousands of potential noncitizens
- Watch as the 1,064-HP 2025 Chevy Corvette ZR1 rips to 205 MPH
- US arrests reputed Peruvian gang leader wanted for 23 killings in his home country
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Does Micellar Water Work As Dry Shampoo? I Tried the TikTok Hack and These Are My Results
- Cardinals superfan known as Rally Runner gets 10 months in prison for joining Jan. 6 Capitol riot
- Why Jana Duggar Says It Was “Disheartening” Watching Her Siblings Getting Married First
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Matthew Perry Ketamine Case: Doctors Called Him “Moron” in Text Messages, Prosecutors Allege
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Does Micellar Water Work As Dry Shampoo? I Tried the TikTok Hack and These Are My Results
- 19 Kids and Counting's Jana Duggar Marries Stephen Wissmann in Arkansas Wedding
- Kihn of rock and roll: Greg Kihn of ‘80s ‘Jeopardy’ song fame dies at 75
- Average rate on 30
- Saturday Night Live Alum Victoria Jackson Shares She Has Inoperable Tumor Amid Cancer Battle
- Jack Russell, former Great White frontman, dies at 63
- 15-year-old who created soap that could treat skin cancer named Time's 2024 Kid of the Year
Recommendation
Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
Disney wrongful death lawsuit over allergy highlights danger of fine print
A studio helps artists with developmental disabilities find their voice. It was almost shuttered.
Eugene Levy, Dan Levy set to co-host Primetime Emmy Awards as first father-son duo
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Alabama election officials make voter registration inactive for thousands of potential noncitizens
Wyoming reporter resigned after admitting to using AI to write articles, generate quotes
Ex-Alabama officer agrees to plead guilty to planting drugs before sham traffic stop